for them it meant giving up their dreams, rushing headlong into a troubled future that a 22-year-old bride and a 23-year-old groom would find difficult to manage.
it meant a lot of fights and a lot of disagreements.
they're still together, hanging on.
i've been mad at them more than enough. sometimes i feel that they should have decided never to have me and my brother at all, that they nipped what they had at the bud when they still could do so. why? because sometimes i feel that when i look into their eyes i see in them a much better future than what we have right now.
but then again i can't imagine not having them for parents.
i can't imagine a couple giving up so much so that their daughter could go to a good school.
i can't imagine parents living apart so that they could provide for us.
twenty-six years later, they've only just begun to understand each other. they are experiencing, 26 years after their honeymoon, what it's like to be with someone.
thanks mama and papa.
happy anniversary.
* * *
what is it with this computer that everyone needs it? there are four other computers. my butt has not warmed up yet. i have spent fifteen minutes trying to get the keyboard and mouse to run. and then they take it away.
i'm pissed as hell.
* * *
foundation day's shaping up ... am good, really good.
* * *
good friend from high school texted me yesterday ... then he told me ...
"maybe he loves you, the only question is how much."
got me thinking.
now i'm really thinking.
every so often someone would ask me, "kayo na ba ulit?" and i wouldn't know what to say. i think we're together in the sense that we care about each other. we're together in the sense that i love him and have no desire of stopping. we're together in the sense that he tries, somehow, to show that he still cares for me, loves me even, no matter how tought things are. we're together in the sense that we can still talk about our fears with each other and we see our future slowly shaping up.
on the other hand, we're not together cause we don't say "i love you" and "i miss you". we're not together cause we don't have set weekends together. we're not together cause right now, he's not ready to commit his future to me.
one day at a time, he said. cool lang tayo, ros.
* * *
while walking from edsa to the heart of ortigas this morning, i slowly formed in my head a theory of life and friendship.
imagine your life to be two circles, one inside the other.
the life you maintain, the life you have with your friends and family is the inner circle. this is where you're totally predictable, how they know that you like pakbet with only kalabasa and sitaw, and that you have a thing for shoes. this is where you have to maintain that facade, that you don't drink coke at all even if it meant not drinking at all. you've been pegged in this circle and should you decide to change the persona in this circle, you'd have to slowly warn everyone in this circle of the impending change.
on the other hand, the outer circle is the peripheral life... where on a really hot day and you're all alone, you can actually drink coke. it's where you think of having a cigarette just to know how it tastes like. it's where you spill all of your secrets and fears to a virtual stranger just cause you know that this person will never infiltrate your inner circle, cause you know that this person will never tell anyone of the things you've told him.
life is comfortable in the inner circle. it's warm and fuzzy, where all the blankets are pink and fluffy (that is if you want them pink and fluffy). nothing much changes here.
but in the outer circle, that's where all your guilty pleasures lie waiting for you to consume them. in my outer circle, i can admit i am captivated by watching kris aquino (i don't really know why!). in my outer circle, i can read nicomachean ethics and be captivated.
* * *
thanks for the lunch, tpie.
* * *
finished reading american gods ten minutes ago. life can go on now.